Vulnerable populations test area
From microLINKS Wiki
Vulnerable Populations and the Value Chain Approach
Vulnerable populations are defined as those groups of people who are typically excluded, disadvantaged or marginalized based on their economic, environmental, social, or cultural characteristics. While many fit this description (e.g., people with disabilities, people living with HIV, refugees), this section of the wiki focuses on three groups commonly targeted by development programs:
It is important to consider that these groups are not homogeneous and not all individuals within these groups are necessarily vulnerable. In particular, there are many women and youth whose social context and individual circumstances do not make them vulnerable.
Why Use the Value Chain Approach With Vulnerable Populations
There are a number of features of the value chain approach that make it particularly relevant for programs targeting poverty reduction and economic growth among vulnerable populations.
- Relationships. The value chain approach recognizes the importance of relationships Vulnerable populations’ relationships are frequently more limited both geographically and in terms of the diversity of individuals and institutions they interact with, thereby reducing their options. The value chain approach can strengthen linkages with public- and private-sector actors with the potential (given additional support) to influence the way vulnerable groups see themselves. For instance, enhancing access to better quality or more affordable goods and services can shift self-perceptions from being recipients of charity to consumers making their own choices.
- Incentives. The value chain approach can be used to identify the economic and social incentives that result from these relationships. The vulnerable often do not prioritize profit maximization as might be expected. Risk-aversion, low self-esteem, a culture of dependency, and other factors impact how all people—especially the vulnerable—act. A focus on incentives opens up the possibility of intervening in ways to strengthen reasons for positive behavior and mitigate negative drivers.
- Behavior. By intervening in ways that shift incentives, vulnerable individuals and groups can be encouraged to act in new ways that contribute to reduced vulnerability and poverty (such as valuing learning, savings, willingness to innovate, etc.). New value chain relationships along with peer pressure at the community level can reinforce these incentives toward new ways of thinking and acting that can reduce vulnerability.
- Social impacts. Economic constraints often cause or exacerbate other social challenges. Inadequate access to resources, for instance, is a major contributor to food insecurity and to morbidity and mortality from HIV/AIDS.[1] School attendance and life expectancy are also often negatively affected. The value chain approach can empower vulnerable people to address these social challenges by strengthening their social capital and increasing their income and assets.
- Sustainability. The focus of the value chain approach on relationships and incentives supports sustainable systems for market engagement. Research findings from Tanzania, for instance, indicate that food aid and public works employment reduced the immediate likelihood of food shortages for vulnerable populations but were insufficient to ensure sustained graduation from donor support.[2]
Challenges in Applying the Value Chain Approach to Vulnerable Populations
Vulnerable populations present unique challenges in the context of value chain development. They tend to be more isolated from the mainstream economy, have far fewer assets, and suffer from more disadvantageous (or exploitative) relationships with the private sector. The need for upgrading is comparatively greater yet the resources to support it are very limited. Vulnerable populations may have limited capacity to make informed choices about how to engage with mainstream markets and allocate their scarce resources. They often view investment decisions and perceive risk in different ways from less vulnerable individuals, and have much shorter time horizons. All of these factors will tend to reduce the role of vulnerable populations in value chain programming if it is not adjusted to encourage their participation.
Although there is growing effort to benefit vulnerable populations with the value chain approach, most projects have not yet designed their monitoring systems to identify the extent to which very poor populations, at-risk youth and disadvantaged women directly and indirectly participate and benefit. Evidence suggests that vulnerable populations are excluded from many initiatives to date for a number of reasons, which include:
- Vulnerable populations face multiple barriers - described above - that make them unlikely to participate if not specifically considered.
- The most common value chain strategies, such as linking producers to markets for their products, are often less appropriate for vulnerable populations that lack required skills, resources and other assets.
- Some projects have assumed that vulnerable populations will benefit from wealth creation within the community even when they are not direct participants, through increased demand for labor or other spending. This assumption of an effective 'trickle-down' of project benefits is however rarely backed with analysis to understand inter-household and intra-household resource flows.
- Projects have found it difficult to strike an appropriate balance between concentrating resources on small numbers of the vulnerable and achieving large-scale impact through a focus on the less vulnerable.
Complementary Approaches to Working with Vulnerable Populations
The value chain approach has much to contribute to advancing the economic situations of vulnerable populations, but they typically require more than this approach alone is likely to provide. People are less vulnerable when they have appropriate mechanisms to save, manage their scarce resources, protect themselves against risks and shocks, resolve conflicts, and transfer assets to subsequent generations. Successful practitioners need to use a portfolio of intervention strategies to meet these complex needs, of which the value chain approach is one valuable component. Other approaches may include, but are not limited to:
Sustainable Livelihoods Approach
The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach (SLA)[3] excels at describing the context, motivations and resources of target populations—especially those that are very vulnerable. The participatory tools that it advocates (e.g., seasonal calendars, wealth rankings) can provide excellent information on who the vulnerable are, how they participate in value chains, and what factors will constrain or enable their engagement in upgrading opportunities. For instance, livelihood tools may identify people that regularly lack resources during the dry season, thereby inhibiting the viability of investments in livestock rearing without access to finance. The value chain approach complements SLA by understanding how to sustainably intervene in the broader market systems in which these people operate.[4]
Food Security
Food security[5] programming can strongly support the value chain approach by increasing the availability of food and the capacity of the poor to access and use it. Building food security is particularly important for extremely vulnerable populations so as to address their basic needs and prepare them for engaging in income generating opportunities through the value chain approach. Without basic food security, people will lack the capacity to engage in longer-term investments. The value chain approach best complements the food security framework through the specific tools that it has developed to improve peoples’ access to food through income generation and sustainably increased production.
Social Protection
Social protection approaches[6] provide sustenance for the most vulnerable with interventions including conditional or unconditional cash transfers, food for work, or assets for work programming. Many such programs also seek to build longer-term capacity to engage in value chains through skills training and the provision of productive assets (e.g., livestock, agricultural machinery). Social protection aims to provide the most vulnerable populations with an opportunity to stabilize their livelihoods and rebuild their self-insurance mechanisms. It also often identifies legal barriers to the economic participation of women, youth and other vulnerable populations, such as inheritance legislation that may strip the vulnerable of critical assets following the death of a family member. The value chain approach complements social protection methodologies by providing vulnerable populations with opportunities to sustainably graduate from social assistance.
Other approaches focus on specific economic outcomes, such as the asset building and consumption-smoothing objectives of group-based savings and lending approaches[7], which may equip vulnerable groups to take advantage of economic opportunities. Such approaches are less effective in identifying or creating new opportunities, which the value chain approach can provide.
Recommended Good Practices
The limited number of initiatives that have integrated the value chain approach with vulnerable populations constrains the identification of definitive best practices. Much remains to be learned. Click here for a list of promising good practices that have emerged from existing experience.
Resources
Resources on the value chain approach and vulnerable populations are provided here.
Footnotes
- ↑ L. Ivers et al, HIV/AIDS, Undernutrition, and Food Insecurity, (2009) 1.
- ↑ J.Wolfe, Household Economic Strengthening in Tanzania: Framework for PEPFAR Programming, (2009), 8.
- ↑ http://www.eldis.org/go/livelihoods/
- ↑ M. Albu, Making Markets Work for Poor, Comparing M4P and SLA frameworks: Complementarities, divergences and synergies, (2008) 17-22.
- ↑ http://www.eldis.org/go/topics/resource-guides/food-security
- ↑ http://www.eldis.org/go/topics/resource-guides/poverty/social-protection
- ↑ http://www.vsla.net/
Navigation
Go to The Very Poor and the Value Chain Approach
Go to Women and the Value Chain Approach
Go to Youth and the Value Chain Approach
Go to Value Chain Development main page
