Facilitation (External)
From microLINKS Wiki
| Pre-project | Analysis | Visioning/Strategy | Start-up/Initial Interventions | Scale-up/Exit/Post Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Why Important
The design of a facilitation-based approach to a systems change project requires design elements that allow flexibility and appropriate performance indicators. | Why Important
Given the differences between systems in different settings, there is no blueprint or model for what a facilitator should do (or not do) to initiate change. Facilitators will always face choices on what actions to take to advance systemic changes; as such the actions are derived from a good understanding of core facilitation concepts: the why, the how and the how to. (Annex 14) | Why Important
An understanding of the actions value system actors are more likely to take to advance theirs and the wider system’s interests will guide what and how a project intervenes to facilitate desired actions by system actors. | Why Important
To ensure the change strategy is consistent with the project’s vision and uses system levers to bring about change. To demonstrate strategy, actions and desired change is both valid and scalable. | Why Important
To ensure that the facilitator retains credibility as an "honest broker" between and among system players and "keeps the door open" for new and or more players ready to push upgrading for system competitiveness. "Bumps in the road" in facilitating system change--wavering trust, stalled (failed) relationships, drop outs, changes in the environment--should be anticipated and seen as opportunities to build momentum for change with market partners aware of benefits/risks of upgrading. |
Knowledge Required
| Knowledge Required
| Knowledge Required
| Knowledge Required
| Knowledge Required
|
Available Tools
| Available Tools
| Available Tools
| Available Tools
| Available Tools
|
Navigation
- Go to Bootcamp
- Go to System Concepts
- Go to Operations (Internal)
- Go to Funding and Funders
